<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>behind the design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Mobile Web</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/09/02/the-mobile-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/09/02/the-mobile-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary Meeker from Morgan Stanley has been quoted (quite frequently) as predicting that within the next five years &#8220;more users will connect to the Internet over mobile devices than desktop PCs.&#8221; Should this come to pass I can&#8217;t say that I will be surprised. When the first smart phones were letting people browser the Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-422" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 25px 25px;" title="iPhone Web" src="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/iphone-safari-web-browser-162x300.jpg" alt="" width="162" height="300" />Mary Meeker from Morgan Stanley has been quoted (<a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/04/12/mary-meeker-mobile-internet-will-soon-overtake-fixed-internet/">quite frequently</a>) as predicting that within the next five years &#8220;more users will connect to the Internet over mobile devices than desktop PCs.&#8221; Should this come to pass I can&#8217;t say that I will be surprised. When the first smart phones were letting people browser the Web I was tempted to get one, but held out because I felt not enough people were using the Web that way yet that I needed to change how we built our websites. Over the years, as the percentage of mobile surfers increased, we have taken it more into account. My instinct tells me, however, that we&#8217;re on the edge of a paradigm shift.</p>
<p>While the part of me that&#8217;s getting old says, &#8220;why can&#8217;t we just do it like we did before,&#8221; the techie in me is excited. The move to mobile in use of the Internet marks a huge step toward the removal of the barriers between us and our connections to each other and information. The device itself is becoming more transparent and allowing us to interact more directly with content, in more ways, on our own terms. As a website designer and developer, I find this both a bit intimidating and a bit exhilarating. When I first started building websites, what drew me to it was the way we could take a few simple rules and build something greater than the sum of it&#8217;s parts.</p>
<p>Some aspects of this shift concern me &#8211; in particular the move from a more &#8220;open&#8221; Internet to one that&#8217;s walled off for the sake of security and proprietary experience. In a way it&#8217;s a return to the old days of CompuServe and AOL, where the producer of the device controlled the experience of the user. It falls to we developers to maintain the push toward stepping outside of the intended bounds of the new products and systems. Yet it&#8217;s easy to understand the drive behind this change. People are tired of spam and viruses, and a more protected environment is appealing.</p>
<p>Another effect this shift will have will be to make large-scale fancy website designs a bit irrelevant. (You know, the ones with all the flowing shapes and flowered patterns, with animated photos and fancy Flash.) For years now, many web designers and developers have pushed for content-based websites, where the design is more a subtle part of the whole, while the content is flexible to accommodate as many viewing/reading devices as possible. This trend will only increase, as the range of devices increases. I think this is a good thing.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t jumped in and joined the ranks of the smart phone owners, don&#8217;t feel bad, as of the date of this posting I haven&#8217;t either. But it&#8217;s about time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/09/02/the-mobile-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook after death</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/08/01/facebook-after-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/08/01/facebook-after-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens to your Facebook profile when you die?  In the ever increasing world of social media, this question is more likely to be asked. Interestingly enough, since about May of 2007 Facebook has had a policy of memorializing the pages of members who have died, hiding some features like the status updates, and locking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-413" title="facebook" src="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/facebook1.png" alt="" width="223" height="222" />What happens to your Facebook profile when you die?  In the ever increasing world of social media, this question is more likely to be asked. Interestingly enough, since about May of 2007 Facebook has had a policy of memorializing the pages of members who have died, hiding some features like the status updates, and locking it down to prevent any hacking attempts. Confirmed friends and family members can still post to the memorialized wall and view the page, which for some people is a great way to maintain a connection.</p>
<p>This policy came about because back in 2007 Facebook had intended to remove the profiles of some students at Virginia Tech who had been killed. Because of online protests and a letter-writing campaign by friends and other  Facebook members who heard that the pages were  to be removed, the company instead decided to memorialize them.</p>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s official memorializing <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=15666">explanation from the FAQ page</a> is:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When a user passes away, we memorialize their account to protect their   privacy. Memorializing an account removes certain sensitive information   (e.g., status updates and contact information) and sets privacy so that   only confirmed friends can see the profile or locate it in search. The   Wall remains so that friends and family can leave posts in  remembrance.  Memorializing an account also prevents all login access to  it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Alternately, you can also request that the profile be taken down completely. Either can be done by <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=deceased">filling out this form</a>. You will need to provide online proof, such as a link to an obituary, as well as some other details like the email address that was used for the account, birth date, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/08/01/facebook-after-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Mark of the Beast</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/07/19/googles-mark-of-the-beast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/07/19/googles-mark-of-the-beast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 05:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it&#8217;s not a screen shot from an old Atari video game. Google has sent out stickers to hundreds of thousands of businesses, with Google&#8217;s QR code encoded with the URL to Google&#8217;s Place page, along with a healthy dose of Google branding. The way it works is that a person with a cell phone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-393" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 25px 25px;" title="google-qr-code-decal" src="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/google-qr-code-decal.gif" alt="" width="217" height="301" /></p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not a screen shot from an old Atari video game.</p>
<p>Google has sent out stickers to hundreds of thousands of businesses, with <a href="http://www.google.com/help/maps/favoriteplaces/business/barcode.html">Google&#8217;s QR code</a> encoded with the URL to Google&#8217;s Place page, along with a healthy dose of Google branding. The way it works is that a person with a cell phone can scan the image, whether it&#8217;s placed on a website or printed material, and be taken to a Google Place page featuring information on that particular business.</p>
<p>Why is this a big deal? It&#8217;s something that&#8217;s simple for people to implement, both businesses and customers will find immediate value in it, and Google benefits by increasing the worth of their &#8220;Place Page&#8221; service, which Google Maps has already been reinforcing. But aside from being good for Google, it&#8217;s actually kind of good for us too. It&#8217;s a step up on the actually useful ladder of technological coolness.</p>
<p>The QR code itself was actually created by Denso-Wave (a Japanese corporation) in 1994, and is very commonly used in Japan. While not having caught on in a huge way yet on our side of the pond, my guess is that due to the explosion social marketing and online involvement, this may very quickly change.</p>
<p>Never slow on the uptake, conspiracy theory folks have already started in&#8230; a Google search for &#8220;google qr code mark of the beast&#8221; at the time of this post indicated 3,270 results. The main commentary right now seems to be <a href="http://pestcontrolseo.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/qr-codes-hidden-information-what-are-they-really-saying/">here</a>. (Most of the rest of the results seem to be either derivative comments or not-quite-related hits. But you know someone had to put forth the idea.)</p>
<p>If there is a conspiracy at Google, however, it&#8217;s only in that they&#8217;ve not set up a way for any business with a Google Place page to have their code. <a href="http://www.google.com/help/maps/favoriteplaces/business/faq.html#">Google has chosen &#8220;favorite&#8221; places</a> and mailed them the stickers, featuring the Google branding very prominently. If you&#8217;d like to take matters into your own hands, rather than waiting for Google to think of you as a best friend, you can go to <a href="http://qrcode.kaywa.com/">http://qrcode.kaywa.com</a> and generate your own code. I don&#8217;t see any reason you couldn&#8217;t create a code for your Google Place URL, but you could also create it for your main business website, your Facebook page, or your cat&#8217;s website.</p>
<h2>Some interesting related links:</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/16/facebook-qr-code/">Facebook Kicks Off Implementation of QR Codes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news179477830.html">Google QR codes to appear in a store window near you</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/07/19/googles-mark-of-the-beast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of the Internet (and how to stop it)</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/06/10/the-future-of-the-internet-and-how-to-stop-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/06/10/the-future-of-the-internet-and-how-to-stop-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This extraordinary book explains the engine that has catapulted the Internet from backwater to ubiquity—and reveals that it is sputtering precisely because of its runaway success. With the unwitting help of its users, the generative Internet is on a path to a lockdown, ending its cycle of innovation—and facilitating unsettling new kinds of control.&#8221;  from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-371" style="border: #ccc solid 1px; margin: 0 25px 25px 0; float: left;" title="cover" src="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/cover-207x300.jpg" alt="The Future of the Internet and how to stop it" width="207" height="300" /></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This extraordinary book explains the engine that has catapulted the Internet from backwater to ubiquity—and reveals that it is sputtering precisely because of its runaway success. With the unwitting help of its users, the generative Internet is on a path to a lockdown, ending its cycle of innovation—and facilitating unsettling new kinds of control.&#8221;  from <a href="http://futureoftheinternet.org/">futureoftheinternet.org</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the book yet, just saw someone else tweet about it so checked it out &#8211; but I ordered me a copy at Amazon as it sounds like a very fascinating book. It&#8217;s the kind of thing I&#8217;ve thought about myself off and on the last few years, but never really took the time to pull into any kind of cohesiveness. Relying on the Web, as I do, for a living, the subject is important to me. But it&#8217;s important to you too, because there&#8217;s very few people who are not directly affected by the Internet in one way or another.</p>
<blockquote style="float: right;"><p><code><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&#038;bc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;t=thupwema-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;m=amazon&#038;f=ifr&#038;md=10FE9736YVPPT7A0FBG2&#038;asins=0300151241" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></code></p></blockquote>
<p>Should the Internet be &#8220;free&#8221; or commercialized? (I think it can and should actually be both.) At the heart of it, most really good ideas are based on ideals. Ideals don&#8217;t happen in nature. For example, &#8220;free health care&#8221;&#8230; eventually, somewhere down the line, someone has to pay for it. Should doctors not be compensated for their time and skills? Should researches not be compensated for the years of effort that go into new medicines? To make health care available for someone with no money, do we compel the doctor to perform medicine with no pay? Do we take money from someone else, in order to pay the doctor to give services to someone with no money? It&#8217;s not a simple situation. So something that is on the face a good thing is not necessarily practical. Likewise, while it seems to make perfect sense for the Internet to be freely available to all so we can share data and information, communicate and connect, how will the technology be paid for? Do Internet Service Providers have a moral obligation to provide service? Does Microsoft have an obligation to distribute computers with email and web software? There would seem to have to be an economic component for the thing to exist. Not having read the book, maybe my soap box routine is way off topic&#8230; but I look forward to reading it and will likely follow up with more afterward.</p>
<p><em><strong>UPDATE (7/10/2010): </strong>The book is pretty interesting, I&#8217;m about half way through. However, if you&#8217;re not the &#8220;techie&#8221; type you&#8217;ll probably find it a bit boring. The author tends to drive his points home by repeating similar ideas in slightly different ways. For anyone in an Internet related business (and what isn&#8217;t these days?) I would recommend adding it to your list.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/06/10/the-future-of-the-internet-and-how-to-stop-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Regularly Updated Browser is a Happy Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/05/03/a-regularly-updated-browser-is-a-happy-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/05/03/a-regularly-updated-browser-is-a-happy-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips for Businesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, what is a web browser? You&#8217;re using one right now. It is a program used to access and change information on the World Wide Web. Some of the most popular ones are Firefox, Internet Explorer,  Safari, and Chrome. You may even be using one on your iPhone or other cell phone. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/happyfirefox1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-360 alignright" style="margin: 15px;border: 0pt none" src="http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/happyfirefox1.jpg" alt="The Fire Fox is Happy" width="282" height="258" /></a><em>First of all, what is a web browser?</em> You&#8217;re using one right now. It is a program used to access and change information on the World Wide Web. Some of the most popular ones are Firefox, Internet Explorer,  Safari, and Chrome. You may even be using one on your iPhone or other cell phone.</p>
<p>A browser is like any other program. It is usually best to keep it  updated with the latest free patches and updates. Unlike other programs  like Microsoft Word or Photoshop, any self respecting browser will never  require you to pay to switch to the most recent major version  (switching from version 2 to  3 perhaps), or even updates (upgrading  from 2.3 to 2.4 for instance) . You can feel free to update all you  want without having to shell out money.</p>
<p><strong>Why does my browser need to be updated?</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably pretty busy. You might not have time to keep your software updated. A browser should be no exception, right? The thing is, browsers are not like other programs. They are your portal to the World Wide Web, and most of the rest of the population on the planet. Thus, they potentially also have access to the scum of the world who would love to steal your personal information.</p>
<p>Keeping your browser updated has many benefits including:</p>
<ol>
<li>The newest software is usually the most secure to hacking and other security threats. No software is ever perfect, but keeping your browser updated will help you stay ahead of the bad guys out there.</li>
<li>The newest browser software displays web pages the best without errors like things being positioned where they shouldn&#8217;t be. Keeping your browser updated makes it easier for us web designers to make websites. For instance, currently around 9% of people use Internet Explorer 6 (which is 2 versions old). This browser doesn&#8217;t display web pages correctly, and makes the web design process take longer because of additional troubleshooting we have to do.</li>
<li>Newer browsers add features to help save you time and make using your browser easier. And&#8230;it&#8217;s free!</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>What about my settings and bookmarks?</strong></p>
<p>Worried about your settings and bookmarks being lost in the update process? No fear. All modern browsers will keep your settings and bookmarks automatically when you update. Some will even let you import bookmarks from other browsers you have on your computer during the installation process. Just pay attention to the windows that come up when you are updating.</p>
<p><strong>It might not be your fault!</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re working at a  company or organization that doesn&#8217;t have the money to have someone  update their computers, or has to use older browsers for some reason,  you may not be able to keep your computer there updated. In that case, I  urge you to keep your own personal computer updated.</p>
<p><strong>Well, how do I keep updated?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not sure which browser you are using or where to go to update it? A simple way to find out is to visit our <a title="Visit our Home Page" href="http://webmaestro.biz/">business home page</a>. When you get there, if you are using an old browser, a box will display telling you what browser you use and how to update it. Or, you can do one of the things listed below:</li>
<li>If you are using Firefox (our favorite browser), it should inform you any time updates are available. If not, you can <a title="Download the newest version of Firefox" href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/upgrade.html">download the most recent version</a>.</li>
<li>Download the newest version of <a title="Download the newest version of Internet Explorer" href="http://www.microsoft.com/nz/windows/internet-explorer/default.aspx">Internet Explorer</a>.</li>
<li>Download the newest version of <a title="Download the newest version of Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>.</li>
<li>Download the newest version of <a title="Download the newest version of Safari." href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmaestro.biz/blog/2010/05/03/a-regularly-updated-browser-is-a-happy-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
